Disguised subject-verb agreement on the SAT Writing section

Rich is one of Knewton’s expert GMAT teachers, but he’s also a whiz at SAT prep.


Subject-verb agreement is a fairly simple thing we all learn about early in school:  If a subject is singular, the verb must also be singular.  For example, in the sentence “Thomas sells clothing,” the singular noun “Thomas” is matched with the singular verb “sells”.  It can be confusing, of course, that “sells” has an ‘s’ at the end (since s’s are often at the end of plural nouns). But because “sells” matches with the singular “Thomas,” it must be singular.

Likewise, a verb will be plural if its subject is plural, as in “The salespeople sell clothing.”  Again, even though the word “sell” may appear to be singular, it is plural because it is matched with the plural “salespeople.”

These are fairly straightforward examples.  But of course, the SAT has to make things a little bit trickier.  Interestingly enough, the SAT Writing section tries to trip you up not by making the content itself more difficult, but by changing the sentence structure so it becomes harder to recognize errors in subject-verb agreement.

Here’s an example of a “find the error” question that does just this:

IDSE sample question

Did you find the disguised subject-verb agreement error?  If not, try removing the modifying clause in between the two commas, and then read the resulting sentence:  “Music theory help musicians both understand their artform and appreciate its nuances.”

Pretty obvious now, isn’t it?  The singular “Music theory” is incorrectly matched with the plural “help.”  The sentence should of course read, “Music theory… helps musicians…”

Notice that what makes this question “difficult” is in no way related to content.  All they do is throw in a modifying clause between the subject and the verb, increasing the distance between the two for confusion’s sake.

And notice that in this case, the SAT writers double your fun by ending the modifying clause with the plural “ensembles,” which looks pretty good when paired with the next word, the plural “help.”  The problem, of course, is that even though “ensembles” and “help” appear back-to-back in the sentence, they are not paired together in terms of the sentence’s meaning.  “Music theory” is the thing that “helps,” not “ensembles.”

This happens extremely often on the SAT Writing section.  The test will separate the subject from the verb to confuse you, and it will also conclude a modifying clause with a noun that correctly matches the main verb in number but not in terms of the sentence’s meaning.

Be on the lookout for these types of errors as you work through your SAT practice questions!  Knowing this simple trick will help you tackle many questions on test day.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

We know the score.

More related posts

  1. Top 10 tips for the GMAT Sentence Correction section
  2. Connector buddies, and the other freshman 15 in SAT Writing
  3. SAT Subject Tests: Choose the Best Math Level for You
  4. GMAT Prep Tip: 5 Bad Habits on the Sentence Correction section
  5. How to ace the SAT Improving Sentences section without turning your brain to mush

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

View Comments

 
  • ArjunArjun says:

    also, shouldnt “A” be as important as ? rather than as important to

  • chrisbknewtonchrisbknewton says:

    No, not in this case. In terms of parallelism, “as important” matches “as performing.” If you changed “to” to another “as,” the sentence would suggest that music theory was just as important as music education. Actually, the sentence is saying that music theory is an essential part ofmusic education. The importance of theory and education are not compared, but the importance of theory and performance are.

    The construction “important to” just expresses that something is a key component of something else (as in, “The doctor's advice was important to her patient's recovery”), so in the sentence above the parallelism is in good shape.

    Thanks for looking out!

  • chris bchris b says:

    No, not in this case. In terms of parallelism, “as important” matches “as performing.” If you changed “to” to another “as,” the sentence would suggest that music theory was just as important as music education. Actually, the sentence is saying that music theory is an essential part ofmusic education. The importance of theory and education are not compared, but the importance of theory and performance are.

    The construction “important to” just expresses that something is a key component of something else (as in, “The doctor’s advice was important to her patient’s recovery”), so in the sentence above the parallelism is in good shape.

    Thanks for looking out!

  • ArjunArjun says:

    oh yes sry missed the “as performing” part .. that completes the construction then ” as important …. as performing .. “

  • ArjunArjun says:

    oh yes sry missed the “as performing” part .. that completes the construction then ” as important …. as performing .. “

 

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus